← All buyers

National Nuclear Regulator

National department / entity · 19 published awards, 2021Q2 to 2025Q3

Based on tenders published to the National Treasury eTenders portal. Municipalities and SOEs are not obliged to publish here: absence of data is not absence of procurement. Coverage for this buyer: 68% of its published awards carry a usable value; geography inferred from the name.

What it buys (8 categories)

Services: Professional · 12 awards (63.2%)Services: Professional12 awardsServices: General · 1 awards (5.3%)Services: Gener…1 awardsTelecommunications · 1 awards (5.3%)Telecommunicati…1 awardsRepair and installation of machinery and equipment · 1 awards (5.3%)Repair and inst…1 awardsWater collection, treatment and supply · 1 awards (5.3%)Water collection, trea…1 awardsServices: Functional (Including Cleaning and Security Services) · 1 awards (5.3%)Services: Functional (…1 awardsSpecialised construction activities · 1 awards (5.3%)Computer programming, consultancy and related activities · 1 awards (5.3%)
Hover or focus a category for detail. Size = award count.

Distinctive vs the national mix (RCA ≥ 1.5): Services: Professional.

Awards per quarter

2021Q1: 0 awards2021Q2: 1 awards2021Q3: 0 awards2021Q4: 0 awards2022Q1: 0 awards2022Q2: 0 awards2022Q3: 1 awards2022Q4: 3 awards2023Q1: 0 awards2023Q2: 1 awards2023Q3: 0 awards2023Q4: 4 awards2024Q1: 1 awards2024Q2: 2 awards2024Q3: 2 awards2024Q4: 1 awards2025Q1: 0 awards2025Q2: 2 awards2025Q3: 1 awards2025Q4: 0 awards2026Q1: 0 awards2026Q2: 0 awards202120222023202420252026

Typical award value vs the national median

Bounded medians over awards with usable values only; small samples are excluded. A ratio above 1 means this buyer's typical award in the category is larger than the national typical award, which can reflect scope, project size or pricing.

CategoryThis buyerNationalRation
Services: ProfessionalR16mR9m1.8×8

Method mix

  • Open tender: 13 (68%)
  • RFQ: 4 (21%)
  • RFP: 1 (5%)
  • Limited / direct: 1 (5%)

Median advertised window: 20 days (national median 19).

Supplier concentration

17 distinct winning firms. The largest takes 11% of awards; concentration index (HHI) 0.06.

Largest winners by award count: DIOPOINT (2), HAMSA CONSULTING ENGINEERS (2), ACCTECH SYSTEMS (1).

Names restate the published award record; nothing analytic is attached to any name, and concentration is a market-structure observation, not an accusation: small buyers and specialist categories concentrate naturally. Right of reply →

Buyers with similar baskets

Nearest procurement mixes by revealed specialisation (cosine similarity), regardless of sphere or size. Descriptive, not a comparison of performance.

Categories at least two of these peers award that National Nuclear Regulator hasn't published awards in: Construction (4 peers), Supplies: General (3 peers), Supplies: Electrical Equipment (3 peers), Other service activities (2 peers), Information and communication (2 peers), Civil engineering (2 peers), Services: Building (2 peers), Information service activities (2 peers). A gap can be a choice as easily as an omission.