← All buyers

Mpumalanga - Agriculture Rural Development and Land Administration

Provincial department · Mpumalanga · 30 published awards, 2022Q2 to 2025Q4

Based on tenders published to the National Treasury eTenders portal. Municipalities and SOEs are not obliged to publish here: absence of data is not absence of procurement. Coverage for this buyer: 10% of its published awards carry a usable value; geography inferred from the name.

What it buys (8 categories)

Services: General · 16 awards (53.3%)Services: General16 awardsSupplies: General · 5 awards (16.7%)Supplies: General5 awardsOther service activities · 3 awards (10.0%)Other service activit…3 awardsConstruction · 2 awards (6.7%)Construction2 awardsSupplies: Electrical Equipment · 1 awards (3.3%)Supplies: Electrical Equipme…1 awardsOther professional, scientific and technical activities · 1 awards (3.3%)Other professional,…1 awardsServices: Professional · 1 awards (3.3%)Services: Professio…1 awardsWater collection, treatment and supply · 1 awards (3.3%)
Hover or focus a category for detail. Size = award count.

Distinctive vs the national mix (RCA ≥ 1.5): Services: General, Supplies: General, Other service activities.

Awards per quarter

2021Q1: 0 awards2021Q2: 0 awards2021Q3: 0 awards2021Q4: 0 awards2022Q1: 0 awards2022Q2: 2 awards2022Q3: 5 awards2022Q4: 4 awards2023Q1: 6 awards2023Q2: 0 awards2023Q3: 0 awards2023Q4: 0 awards2024Q1: 0 awards2024Q2: 0 awards2024Q3: 1 awards2024Q4: 0 awards2025Q1: 2 awards2025Q2: 2 awards2025Q3: 1 awards2025Q4: 7 awards2026Q1: 0 awards2026Q2: 0 awards202120222023202420252026

Method mix

  • Open tender: 29 (97%)
  • Other: 1 (3%)

Median advertised window: 28 days (national median 19).

Supplier concentration

27 distinct winning firms. The largest takes 7% of awards; concentration index (HHI) 0.04.

Largest winners by award count: 247 KHOMPHO TRADING LOGISTICS (2), MPILOKAMFANA (2), MOCHABANE MEDICAL (2).

Names restate the published award record; nothing analytic is attached to any name, and concentration is a market-structure observation, not an accusation: small buyers and specialist categories concentrate naturally. Right of reply →

Buyers with similar baskets

Nearest procurement mixes by revealed specialisation (cosine similarity), regardless of sphere or size. Descriptive, not a comparison of performance.

Categories at least two of these peers award that Mpumalanga - Agriculture Rural Development and Land Administration hasn't published awards in: Services: Functional (Including Cleaning and Security Services) (4 peers), Repair and installation of machinery and equipment (4 peers), Civil engineering (3 peers), Construction of buildings (2 peers), Information and communication (2 peers), Supplies: Stationery/Printing (2 peers), Information service activities (2 peers), Services: Civil (2 peers). A gap can be a choice as easily as an omission.

Neighbours also buying

Categories several buyers in Mpumalanga awarded during 2025Q4 and 2026Q1: where needs overlap, joint or transversal procurement can save real money.

  • Services: General · 6 buyers (including this one) e.g. Mpumalanga - Agriculture Rural Development and Land Administration; ESKOM; Mpumalanga - Co-operative Governance, Human Settlements, and Traditional Affairs
  • Other service activities · 3 buyers (including this one) e.g. Eskom National Transmission Company of South Africa; Agricultural Research Council; ESKOM
  • Services: Functional (Including Cleaning and Security Services) · 3 buyers e.g. Labour; Justice & Constitutional Development; Road Accident Fund
  • Services: Professional · 2 buyers (including this one) e.g. Justice & Constitutional Development; Transnet SOC Ltd
  • Construction · 2 buyers (including this one) e.g. Water and Sanitation; Eskom National Transmission Company of South Africa