← All buyers

National Electronic Media Institute of South Africa

National department / entity · 7 published awards, 2024Q1 to 2025Q3

Based on tenders published to the National Treasury eTenders portal. Municipalities and SOEs are not obliged to publish here: absence of data is not absence of procurement. Coverage for this buyer: 100% of its published awards carry a usable value; geography inferred from the name.

What it buys (3 categories)

Services: Professional · 4 awards (57.1%)Services: Professional4 awardsComputer programming, consultancy and related activities · 2 awards (28.6%)Computer programming, consultancy and related activit…2 awardsInsurance, reinsurance and pension funding, except compulsory social security · 1 awards (14.3%)Insurance, reinsurance and pension funding, except co…1 awards
Hover or focus a category for detail. Size = award count.

Distinctive vs the national mix (RCA ≥ 1.5): Services: Professional.

Awards per quarter

2021Q1: 0 awards2021Q2: 0 awards2021Q3: 0 awards2021Q4: 0 awards2022Q1: 0 awards2022Q2: 0 awards2022Q3: 0 awards2022Q4: 0 awards2023Q1: 0 awards2023Q2: 0 awards2023Q3: 0 awards2023Q4: 0 awards2024Q1: 1 awards2024Q2: 0 awards2024Q3: 1 awards2024Q4: 0 awards2025Q1: 2 awards2025Q2: 1 awards2025Q3: 2 awards2025Q4: 0 awards2026Q1: 0 awards2026Q2: 0 awards202120222023202420252026

Method mix

  • RFP: 4 (57%)
  • Open tender: 3 (43%)

Median advertised window: 22 days (national median 19).

Supplier concentration

7 distinct winning firms. The largest takes 14% of awards; concentration index (HHI) 0.14.

Largest winners by award count: AFRICA RISK AND INSURANCE SERVICES (1), KHULAGRO ADVISORY (1), TEMBE GROUP (1).

Names restate the published award record; nothing analytic is attached to any name, and concentration is a market-structure observation, not an accusation: small buyers and specialist categories concentrate naturally. Right of reply →

Buyers with similar baskets

Nearest procurement mixes by revealed specialisation (cosine similarity), regardless of sphere or size. Descriptive, not a comparison of performance.

Categories at least two of these peers award that National Electronic Media Institute of South Africa hasn't published awards in: Professional, scientific and technical activities (3 peers), Services: General (2 peers), Construction (2 peers), Other service activities (2 peers), Legal and accounting activities (2 peers), Travel agency, tour operator, reservation service and related activities (2 peers), Financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding (2 peers). A gap can be a choice as easily as an omission.