← All buyers

Construction Industry Development Board

National department / entity · 15 published awards, 2021Q2 to 2025Q2

Based on tenders published to the National Treasury eTenders portal. Municipalities and SOEs are not obliged to publish here: absence of data is not absence of procurement. Coverage for this buyer: 40% of its published awards carry a usable value; geography inferred from the name.

What it buys (5 categories)

Services: Professional · 8 awards (53.3%)Services: Professional8 awardsServices: General · 3 awards (20.0%)Services: General3 awardsInsurance, reinsurance and pension funding, except compulsory social security · 2 awards (13.3%)Insurance, reinsurance …2 awardsLegal and accounting activities · 1 awards (6.7%)Legal and accounting activit…1 awardsProfessional, scientific and technical activities · 1 awards (6.7%)Professional, scientific and…1 awards
Hover or focus a category for detail. Size = award count.

Distinctive vs the national mix (RCA ≥ 1.5): Services: Professional, Services: General.

Awards per quarter

2021Q1: 0 awards2021Q2: 2 awards2021Q3: 1 awards2021Q4: 0 awards2022Q1: 0 awards2022Q2: 1 awards2022Q3: 0 awards2022Q4: 5 awards2023Q1: 0 awards2023Q2: 0 awards2023Q3: 1 awards2023Q4: 0 awards2024Q1: 1 awards2024Q2: 0 awards2024Q3: 0 awards2024Q4: 3 awards2025Q1: 0 awards2025Q2: 1 awards2025Q3: 0 awards2025Q4: 0 awards2026Q1: 0 awards2026Q2: 0 awards202120222023202420252026

Method mix

  • Open tender: 13 (87%)
  • RFP: 2 (13%)

Median advertised window: 41 days (national median 19).

Supplier concentration

14 distinct winning firms. The largest takes 13% of awards; concentration index (HHI) 0.08.

Largest winners by award count: SWM COMMUNICATIONS (2), Enterprise University of Pretoria (1), MMT Inland (Pty) Ltd (1).

Names restate the published award record; nothing analytic is attached to any name, and concentration is a market-structure observation, not an accusation: small buyers and specialist categories concentrate naturally. Right of reply →

Buyers with similar baskets

Nearest procurement mixes by revealed specialisation (cosine similarity), regardless of sphere or size. Descriptive, not a comparison of performance.

Categories at least two of these peers award that Construction Industry Development Board hasn't published awards in: Computer programming, consultancy and related activities (3 peers), Construction (2 peers), Other service activities (2 peers), Travel agency, tour operator, reservation service and related activities (2 peers), Financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding (2 peers). A gap can be a choice as easily as an omission.