← All buyers

The South African Bureau of Standards (SABS)

National department / entity · 5 published awards, 2023Q3 to 2025Q4

Based on tenders published to the National Treasury eTenders portal. Municipalities and SOEs are not obliged to publish here: absence of data is not absence of procurement. Coverage for this buyer: 80% of its published awards carry a usable value; geography inferred from the name.

What it buys (4 categories)

Information and communication · 2 awards (40.0%)Information and communication2 awardsManufacture of chemicals and chemical products · 1 awards (20.0%)Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products1 awardsOther service activities · 1 awards (20.0%)Other service activities1 awardsFinancial and insurance activities · 1 awards (20.0%)Financial and insurance …1 awards
Hover or focus a category for detail. Size = award count.

Awards per quarter

2021Q1: 0 awards2021Q2: 0 awards2021Q3: 0 awards2021Q4: 0 awards2022Q1: 0 awards2022Q2: 0 awards2022Q3: 0 awards2022Q4: 0 awards2023Q1: 0 awards2023Q2: 0 awards2023Q3: 1 awards2023Q4: 0 awards2024Q1: 0 awards2024Q2: 0 awards2024Q3: 0 awards2024Q4: 0 awards2025Q1: 0 awards2025Q2: 0 awards2025Q3: 2 awards2025Q4: 2 awards2026Q1: 0 awards2026Q2: 0 awards202120222023202420252026

Method mix

  • RFP: 4 (80%)
  • RFQ: 1 (20%)

Median advertised window: 21 days (national median 19).

Supplier concentration

5 distinct winning firms. The largest takes 20% of awards; concentration index (HHI) 0.20.

Largest winners by award count: LETLAMABO PROJECTS AND INVESTMENTS (1), JUST CLIENT CONSULTING (1), SANKOFA INSURANCE BROKERS (1).

Names restate the published award record; nothing analytic is attached to any name, and concentration is a market-structure observation, not an accusation: small buyers and specialist categories concentrate naturally. Right of reply →

Buyers with similar baskets

Nearest procurement mixes by revealed specialisation (cosine similarity), regardless of sphere or size. Descriptive, not a comparison of performance.

Categories at least two of these peers award that The South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) hasn't published awards in: Services: Professional (5 peers), Services: General (4 peers), Construction (4 peers), Supplies: General (4 peers), Food and beverage service activities (4 peers), Civil engineering (3 peers), Supplies: Electrical Equipment (3 peers), Supplies: Medical (3 peers). A gap can be a choice as easily as an omission.