← All buyers

Social Housing Regulatory Authority

National department / entity · 6 published awards, 2023Q1 to 2025Q4

Based on tenders published to the National Treasury eTenders portal. Municipalities and SOEs are not obliged to publish here: absence of data is not absence of procurement. Coverage for this buyer: 33% of its published awards carry a usable value; geography inferred from the name.

What it buys (4 categories)

Services: Professional · 2 awards (33.3%)Services: Professional2 awardsProfessional, scientific and technical activities · 2 awards (33.3%)Professional, scientific and technical activities2 awardsServices: Functional (Including Cleaning and Security Services) · 1 awards (16.7%)Services: Functional…1 awardsOther professional, scientific and technical activities · 1 awards (16.7%)Other professional, …1 awards
Hover or focus a category for detail. Size = award count.

Awards per quarter

2021Q1: 0 awards2021Q2: 0 awards2021Q3: 0 awards2021Q4: 0 awards2022Q1: 0 awards2022Q2: 0 awards2022Q3: 0 awards2022Q4: 0 awards2023Q1: 1 awards2023Q2: 0 awards2023Q3: 0 awards2023Q4: 0 awards2024Q1: 1 awards2024Q2: 0 awards2024Q3: 0 awards2024Q4: 1 awards2025Q1: 1 awards2025Q2: 0 awards2025Q3: 1 awards2025Q4: 1 awards2026Q1: 0 awards2026Q2: 0 awards202120222023202420252026

Method mix

  • Open tender: 5 (83%)
  • RFP: 1 (17%)

Median advertised window: 29 days (national median 19).

Supplier concentration

6 distinct winning firms. The largest takes 17% of awards; concentration index (HHI) 0.17.

Largest winners by award count: KGSHARP LABORATORIES (1), VLK CONSULTING SERVICES (1), CITIES STUDIO AFRICA (1).

Names restate the published award record; nothing analytic is attached to any name, and concentration is a market-structure observation, not an accusation: small buyers and specialist categories concentrate naturally. Right of reply →

Buyers with similar baskets

Nearest procurement mixes by revealed specialisation (cosine similarity), regardless of sphere or size. Descriptive, not a comparison of performance.

Categories at least two of these peers award that Social Housing Regulatory Authority hasn't published awards in: Services: General (3 peers), Other service activities (2 peers). A gap can be a choice as easily as an omission.