← All buyers

Rural Development & Land Reform

National department / entity · 8 published awards, 2025Q3 to 2026Q1

Based on tenders published to the National Treasury eTenders portal. Municipalities and SOEs are not obliged to publish here: absence of data is not absence of procurement. Coverage for this buyer: 100% of its published awards carry a usable value; geography inferred from the name.

What it buys (3 categories)

Construction · 5 awards (62.5%)Construction5 awardsServices: General · 2 awards (25.0%)Services: General2 awardsServices: Functional (Including Cleaning and Security Services) · 1 awards (12.5%)Services: Functional (Including Cleaning and S…1 awards
Hover or focus a category for detail. Size = award count.

Distinctive vs the national mix (RCA ≥ 1.5): Construction.

Awards per quarter

2021Q1: 0 awards2021Q2: 0 awards2021Q3: 0 awards2021Q4: 0 awards2022Q1: 0 awards2022Q2: 0 awards2022Q3: 0 awards2022Q4: 0 awards2023Q1: 0 awards2023Q2: 0 awards2023Q3: 0 awards2023Q4: 0 awards2024Q1: 0 awards2024Q2: 0 awards2024Q3: 0 awards2024Q4: 0 awards2025Q1: 0 awards2025Q2: 0 awards2025Q3: 1 awards2025Q4: 4 awards2026Q1: 3 awards2026Q2: 0 awards202120222023202420252026

Typical award value vs the national median

Bounded medians over awards with usable values only; small samples are excluded. A ratio above 1 means this buyer's typical award in the category is larger than the national typical award, which can reflect scope, project size or pricing.

CategoryThis buyerNationalRation
ConstructionR8mR45m0.2×5

Method mix

  • RFQ: 7 (88%)
  • Open tender: 1 (13%)

Median advertised window: 15 days (national median 19).

Supplier concentration

6 distinct winning firms. The largest takes 25% of awards; concentration index (HHI) 0.19.

Largest winners by award count: LELENDLALA CONSTRUCTION (2), K9 VIP SECURITY (2), KOKAKE CONSTRUCTION AND PROJECTS (1).

Names restate the published award record; nothing analytic is attached to any name, and concentration is a market-structure observation, not an accusation: small buyers and specialist categories concentrate naturally. Right of reply →

Buyers with similar baskets

Nearest procurement mixes by revealed specialisation (cosine similarity), regardless of sphere or size. Descriptive, not a comparison of performance.

Categories at least two of these peers award that Rural Development & Land Reform hasn't published awards in: Services: Professional (4 peers), Supplies: Computer Equipment (2 peers). A gap can be a choice as easily as an omission.