← All buyers

Quality Council for Trades and Occupations

National department / entity · 28 published awards, 2021Q2 to 2025Q4

Based on tenders published to the National Treasury eTenders portal. Municipalities and SOEs are not obliged to publish here: absence of data is not absence of procurement. Coverage for this buyer: 64% of its published awards carry a usable value; geography inferred from the name.

What it buys (9 categories)

Information and communication · 7 awards (25.0%)Information and communication7 awardsServices: Professional · 7 awards (25.0%)Services: Professional7 awardsServices: General · 6 awards (21.4%)Services: General6 awardsInformation service activities · 2 awards (7.1%)Information ser…2 awardsServices: Building · 2 awards (7.1%)Services: Building2 awardsLegal and accounting activities · 1 awards (3.6%)Legal and accounting activities1 awardsComputer programming, consultancy and related activities · 1 awards (3.6%)Computer programming…1 awardsServices: Functional (Including Cleaning and Security Services) · 1 awards (3.6%)Services: Functional…1 awardsProfessional, scientific and technical activities · 1 awards (3.6%)
Hover or focus a category for detail. Size = award count.

Distinctive vs the national mix (RCA ≥ 1.5): Information and communication, Services: Professional, Services: General.

Awards per quarter

2021Q1: 0 awards2021Q2: 2 awards2021Q3: 1 awards2021Q4: 2 awards2022Q1: 1 awards2022Q2: 0 awards2022Q3: 1 awards2022Q4: 1 awards2023Q1: 1 awards2023Q2: 7 awards2023Q3: 3 awards2023Q4: 0 awards2024Q1: 0 awards2024Q2: 2 awards2024Q3: 2 awards2024Q4: 0 awards2025Q1: 0 awards2025Q2: 0 awards2025Q3: 3 awards2025Q4: 2 awards2026Q1: 0 awards2026Q2: 0 awards202120222023202420252026

Typical award value vs the national median

Bounded medians over awards with usable values only; small samples are excluded. A ratio above 1 means this buyer's typical award in the category is larger than the national typical award, which can reflect scope, project size or pricing.

CategoryThis buyerNationalRation
Services: ProfessionalR998kR9m0.1×5

Method mix

  • RFP: 16 (57%)
  • Open tender: 12 (43%)

Median advertised window: 24 days (national median 19).

Supplier concentration

26 distinct winning firms. The largest takes 7% of awards; concentration index (HHI) 0.04.

Largest winners by award count: SELECT SIFISO (2), ARGANTIC GACS (2), LIYATECH (1).

Names restate the published award record; nothing analytic is attached to any name, and concentration is a market-structure observation, not an accusation: small buyers and specialist categories concentrate naturally. Right of reply →

Buyers with similar baskets

Nearest procurement mixes by revealed specialisation (cosine similarity), regardless of sphere or size. Descriptive, not a comparison of performance.

Categories at least two of these peers award that Quality Council for Trades and Occupations hasn't published awards in: Accommodation (2 peers), Other professional, scientific and technical activities (2 peers), Travel agency, tour operator, reservation service and related activities (2 peers). A gap can be a choice as easily as an omission.