National - Environment, Forestry and Fisheries
National department / entity · 88 published awards, 2021Q2 to 2026Q1
Based on tenders published to the National Treasury eTenders portal. Municipalities and SOEs are not obliged to publish here: absence of data is not absence of procurement. Coverage for this buyer: 78% of its published awards carry a usable value; geography inferred from the name.
What it buys (14 categories)
Distinctive vs the national mix (RCA ≥ 1.5): Services: Professional, Other service activities, Education.
Awards per quarter
Typical award value vs the national median
Bounded medians over awards with usable values only; small samples are excluded. A ratio above 1 means this buyer's typical award in the category is larger than the national typical award, which can reflect scope, project size or pricing.
| Category | This buyer | National | Ratio | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other service activities | R2m | R8m | 0.3× | 29 |
| Services: Professional | R3m | R9m | 0.4× | 26 |
Method mix
- Open tender: 54 (61%)
- RFQ: 26 (30%)
- RFP: 6 (7%)
- Other: 2 (2%)
Median advertised window: 22 days (national median 19).
Supplier concentration
80 distinct winning firms. The largest takes 5% of awards; concentration index (HHI) 0.01.
Largest winners by award count: GREEN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION (4), MAMADI AND COMPANY SA (3), LINDON CONSULTING CORPORATION (2).
Names restate the published award record; nothing analytic is attached to any name, and concentration is a market-structure observation, not an accusation: small buyers and specialist categories concentrate naturally. Right of reply →
Buyers with similar baskets
Nearest procurement mixes by revealed specialisation (cosine similarity), regardless of sphere or size. Descriptive, not a comparison of performance.