← All buyers

Ingonyama Trust Board

National department / entity · 11 published awards, 2024Q4 to 2026Q2

Based on tenders published to the National Treasury eTenders portal. Municipalities and SOEs are not obliged to publish here: absence of data is not absence of procurement. Coverage for this buyer: 91% of its published awards carry a usable value; geography inferred from the name.

What it buys (8 categories)

Information and communication · 3 awards (27.3%)Information and communication3 awardsConstruction · 2 awards (18.2%)Construction2 awardsOther service activities · 1 awards (9.1%)Other service activities1 awardsActivities auxiliary to financial service and insurance activities. · 1 awards (9.1%)Activities auxiliary to financial…1 awardsFinancial service activities, except insurance and pension funding · 1 awards (9.1%)Financial service activities, exc…1 awardsEmployment activities · 1 awards (9.1%)Employment activ…1 awardsReal estate activities · 1 awards (9.1%)Real estate acti…1 awardsActivities of head offices; management consultancy activities · 1 awards (9.1%)Activities of head offices; manag…1 awards
Hover or focus a category for detail. Size = award count.

Distinctive vs the national mix (RCA ≥ 1.5): Information and communication.

Awards per quarter

2021Q1: 0 awards2021Q2: 0 awards2021Q3: 0 awards2021Q4: 0 awards2022Q1: 0 awards2022Q2: 0 awards2022Q3: 0 awards2022Q4: 0 awards2023Q1: 0 awards2023Q2: 0 awards2023Q3: 0 awards2023Q4: 0 awards2024Q1: 0 awards2024Q2: 0 awards2024Q3: 0 awards2024Q4: 3 awards2025Q1: 0 awards2025Q2: 1 awards2025Q3: 1 awards2025Q4: 0 awards2026Q1: 5 awards2026Q2: 1 awards202120222023202420252026

Method mix

  • RFQ: 10 (91%)
  • Open tender: 1 (9%)

Median advertised window: 9 days (national median 19).

Supplier concentration

10 distinct winning firms. The largest takes 18% of awards; concentration index (HHI) 0.11.

Largest winners by award count: AFRIPACT CIVILS (2), HSG ATTORNEYS (1), NKOSINGIPHE INKAZIMULO TRADING AND PROJECTS (1).

Names restate the published award record; nothing analytic is attached to any name, and concentration is a market-structure observation, not an accusation: small buyers and specialist categories concentrate naturally. Right of reply →

Buyers with similar baskets

Nearest procurement mixes by revealed specialisation (cosine similarity), regardless of sphere or size. Descriptive, not a comparison of performance.

Categories at least two of these peers award that Ingonyama Trust Board hasn't published awards in: Services: Professional (4 peers), Legal and accounting activities (3 peers), Services: General (2 peers), Services: Functional (Including Cleaning and Security Services) (2 peers), Rental and leasing activities (2 peers), Security and investigation activities (2 peers), Travel agency, tour operator, reservation service and related activities (2 peers). A gap can be a choice as easily as an omission.