← All buyers

Independent Development Trust

National department / entity · 38 published awards, 2021Q4 to 2026Q1

Based on tenders published to the National Treasury eTenders portal. Municipalities and SOEs are not obliged to publish here: absence of data is not absence of procurement. Coverage for this buyer: 61% of its published awards carry a usable value; geography inferred from the name.

What it buys (4 categories)

Construction · 21 awards (55.3%)Construction21 awardsConstruction of buildings · 13 awards (34.2%)Construction of buildings13 awardsServices: Building · 3 awards (7.9%)Services: Building3 awardsRental and leasing activities · 1 awards (2.6%)Rental and le…1 awards
Hover or focus a category for detail. Size = award count.

Distinctive vs the national mix (RCA ≥ 1.5): Construction, Construction of buildings, Services: Building.

Awards per quarter

2021Q1: 0 awards2021Q2: 0 awards2021Q3: 0 awards2021Q4: 1 awards2022Q1: 8 awards2022Q2: 6 awards2022Q3: 0 awards2022Q4: 0 awards2023Q1: 1 awards2023Q2: 2 awards2023Q3: 3 awards2023Q4: 10 awards2024Q1: 4 awards2024Q2: 0 awards2024Q3: 1 awards2024Q4: 1 awards2025Q1: 0 awards2025Q2: 0 awards2025Q3: 0 awards2025Q4: 0 awards2026Q1: 1 awards2026Q2: 0 awards202120222023202420252026

Typical award value vs the national median

Bounded medians over awards with usable values only; small samples are excluded. A ratio above 1 means this buyer's typical award in the category is larger than the national typical award, which can reflect scope, project size or pricing.

CategoryThis buyerNationalRation
Construction of buildingsR1.2bnR37m33.0×11
ConstructionR4mR45m0.1×8

Method mix

  • Open tender: 25 (66%)
  • RFQ: 8 (21%)
  • RFP: 5 (13%)

Median advertised window: 22 days (national median 19).

Supplier concentration

35 distinct winning firms. The largest takes 8% of awards; concentration index (HHI) 0.03.

Largest winners by award count: KHONZI TRADING AND PROJECTS (3), RGZ PROJECTS (2), RIVER QUEEN TRADING 458 (1).

Names restate the published award record; nothing analytic is attached to any name, and concentration is a market-structure observation, not an accusation: small buyers and specialist categories concentrate naturally. Right of reply →

Buyers with similar baskets

Nearest procurement mixes by revealed specialisation (cosine similarity), regardless of sphere or size. Descriptive, not a comparison of performance.

Categories at least two of these peers award that Independent Development Trust hasn't published awards in: Services: Professional (4 peers), Services: General (4 peers), Civil engineering (3 peers), Supplies: General (2 peers), Other professional, scientific and technical activities (2 peers). A gap can be a choice as easily as an omission.