← All buyers

Government Technical Advisory Centre (GTAC)

National department / entity · 59 published awards, 2021Q2 to 2026Q2

Based on tenders published to the National Treasury eTenders portal. Municipalities and SOEs are not obliged to publish here: absence of data is not absence of procurement. Coverage for this buyer: 56% of its published awards carry a usable value; geography inferred from the name.

What it buys (4 categories)

Services: Professional · 54 awards (91.5%)Services: Professional54 awardsServices: General · 2 awards (3.4%)Construction · 2 awards (3.4%)Legal and accounting activities · 1 awards (1.7%)
Hover or focus a category for detail. Size = award count.

Distinctive vs the national mix (RCA ≥ 1.5): Services: Professional.

Awards per quarter

2021Q1: 0 awards2021Q2: 2 awards2021Q3: 3 awards2021Q4: 2 awards2022Q1: 1 awards2022Q2: 1 awards2022Q3: 3 awards2022Q4: 1 awards2023Q1: 3 awards2023Q2: 11 awards2023Q3: 1 awards2023Q4: 6 awards2024Q1: 3 awards2024Q2: 6 awards2024Q3: 3 awards2024Q4: 3 awards2025Q1: 1 awards2025Q2: 6 awards2025Q3: 1 awards2025Q4: 1 awards2026Q1: 0 awards2026Q2: 1 awards202120222023202420252026

Typical award value vs the national median

Bounded medians over awards with usable values only; small samples are excluded. A ratio above 1 means this buyer's typical award in the category is larger than the national typical award, which can reflect scope, project size or pricing.

CategoryThis buyerNationalRation
Services: ProfessionalR998kR9m0.1×31

Method mix

  • Open tender: 32 (54%)
  • RFQ: 19 (32%)
  • RFP: 8 (14%)

Median advertised window: 21 days (national median 19).

Supplier concentration

57 distinct winning firms. The largest takes 3% of awards; concentration index (HHI) 0.02.

Largest winners by award count: J MAYNARD (SOUTH AFRICA) (2), CATHU CONSULTING (2), Diale Mogashoa Inc. (1).

Names restate the published award record; nothing analytic is attached to any name, and concentration is a market-structure observation, not an accusation: small buyers and specialist categories concentrate naturally. Right of reply →

Buyers with similar baskets

Nearest procurement mixes by revealed specialisation (cosine similarity), regardless of sphere or size. Descriptive, not a comparison of performance.