← All buyers

Artscape

National department / entity · 10 published awards, 2021Q4 to 2026Q1

Based on tenders published to the National Treasury eTenders portal. Municipalities and SOEs are not obliged to publish here: absence of data is not absence of procurement. Coverage for this buyer: 60% of its published awards carry a usable value; geography inferred from the name.

What it buys (4 categories)

Services: Professional · 4 awards (40.0%)Services: Professional4 awardsSupplies: General · 3 awards (30.0%)Supplies: General3 awardsServices: Functional (Including Cleaning and Security Services) · 2 awards (20.0%)Services: Functional (Including Clean…2 awardsTravel agency, tour operator, reservation service and related activities · 1 awards (10.0%)Travel agency, tour operator, reserva…1 awards
Hover or focus a category for detail. Size = award count.

Distinctive vs the national mix (RCA ≥ 1.5): Services: Professional, Supplies: General.

Awards per quarter

2021Q1: 0 awards2021Q2: 0 awards2021Q3: 0 awards2021Q4: 1 awards2022Q1: 0 awards2022Q2: 1 awards2022Q3: 1 awards2022Q4: 0 awards2023Q1: 1 awards2023Q2: 0 awards2023Q3: 0 awards2023Q4: 0 awards2024Q1: 1 awards2024Q2: 0 awards2024Q3: 0 awards2024Q4: 0 awards2025Q1: 0 awards2025Q2: 4 awards2025Q3: 0 awards2025Q4: 0 awards2026Q1: 1 awards2026Q2: 0 awards202120222023202420252026

Method mix

  • Open tender: 9 (90%)
  • RFP: 1 (10%)

Median advertised window: 26 days (national median 19).

Supplier concentration

9 distinct winning firms. The largest takes 20% of awards; concentration index (HHI) 0.12.

Largest winners by award count: DWR DISTRIBUTION (2), TSEBO SOLUTIONS GROUP (1), PROSOUND (1).

Names restate the published award record; nothing analytic is attached to any name, and concentration is a market-structure observation, not an accusation: small buyers and specialist categories concentrate naturally. Right of reply →

Buyers with similar baskets

Nearest procurement mixes by revealed specialisation (cosine similarity), regardless of sphere or size. Descriptive, not a comparison of performance.

Categories at least two of these peers award that Artscape hasn't published awards in: Services: General (3 peers). A gap can be a choice as easily as an omission.